My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 2002 12 16 (Regular)
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
2002
>
AG 2002 12 16 (Regular)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2006 5:02:05 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:44:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
12/16/2002
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
reduction in persons per unit in rental housing at 2.25, but growth in persons per unit in owner <br />occupied units at 2.66. The types of housing constructed recently may have influenced these <br />changes in persons per household. Developments such as Oldenburg and Mountain Brook have <br />increased growth in the size of persons per household for owner occupied, while construction of <br />duplexes may have contributed to reducing the persons per rental unit in the ten-year period by <br />converting renters into home owners. <br /> <br />Table 3 - Population and Housing Figures for Mount Pleasant <br /> <br />Year Population HouslngUnEs <br />1990 1027 447 <br />2000 1259 521 <br /> <br />Several assumptions are made to arrive at the projections in Table 4. First, it assumes that the <br />growth will occur at a constant rate. Second, it assumes that the economy will continue to <br />support the current growth rate until 2015. Finally, it assumes that the necessary public services <br />will be in place to continue to support the projected rate of growth. These are very general <br />assumptions, as such the projections in Table 4 should be used cautiously as future population <br />may be greater or less than these projections if the underlying assumptions change. <br /> <br />Known factors that may affect the projected growth in Mount Pleasant over the next fifteen years <br />are the Albemarle-Concord waterline and the NC Highway 49 widening and improvements. In <br />the late 1990's and early 2000'S Mount Pleasant suffered some economic setbacks with the <br />closing of mills in town reducing available employment. These factors could affect the projected <br />residential and commercial growth in Mount Pleasant as well as thc Eastern Area. <br /> <br />Table 4 - Population Projections for Mount Pleasant <br /> <br />Year Population <br />2000 1259 <br />2005 1401 <br />2010 1543 <br />2015 1717 <br /> <br />The following are some general demographic topics to summarize thc existing statistics in the <br />Town. Mount Peasant's demographics show a fairly equal mix of female and male residences. <br />Female residents constituted fifty-four percent of the population and males constituted forty-six <br />percent of the population in the 1990 as well as the 2000 Census. Mount Plcasant's racial <br />breakdown is as follows: White: 93.1% (1,172); Black: 5.9% (74); and Other: < 1% (13). The <br />population of Whites has risen some since 1990 when it was approximately 90% and Blacks have <br />dropped fi.om about 10% in 1990. The median age in Mount Pleasant in 2000 is 37.8 years. The <br />average family size in Mount Pleasant is 3.00 persons. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.