Laserfiche WebLink
requirements. Coupled with the cluster development techniques, lowering permissible densities <br />is an efficient way to preserve open space and agricultural land. <br /> <br />In the various community meetings held in the planning area, the reduction of residential <br />densities was a popular concept. While some felt that one unit per l0 acres was appropriate the <br />majority felt that one unit per 5 acres was most feasible. To address the objections of those that <br />wanted greater flexibility to provide land to family members and/or wanted to earn some income <br />off the sale of their land and for those with smaller lots who anticipated the ability to later divide <br />their land, a compromise to a strict adherence to a one unit per 5 acre requirement was <br />formulated. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />· That the following standards apply to the Agriculture and Open Space District as shown on <br /> the future land use map in Appendix A: <br /> <br />The first 5 units be permitted at a rate of one unit per acre, the next 2 units <br />be at a rate of one unit per 2.5 acres and the remaining units be at a rate of <br />one unit per 5 acres. The minimum lot size would continue to be one acre <br />for areas not served by a utility system operated by a governmental <br />agency. <br /> <br />Defining Urban Service Areas <br /> <br />Another tool that can assist in the preservation of agricultural land and open space is the <br />designation of Urban Service Areas. The designation of Urban Service Areas gives both the <br />public and private sectors a firm indication where public and private dollars should be invested in <br />public infrastructure, particularly in regards to public water and sewer infrastructure. <br /> <br />In the various community meetings held during this planning process, participants expressed <br />concern in regard to the provision of public utility service in the rural portions of the planning <br />area. The vast majority of participants felt that public utility investments should not be made in <br />areas outside the Town of Mount Pleasant ETJ. These residents felt that once utility service was <br />provided the eastern portion of the County would develop rapidly. Residents were also <br />concerned that if this portion of the County was opened to development the resulting rapid rate of <br />growth would be fiscally unsustainable, putting a strain on already stretched public facilities and <br />budgets. <br /> <br />In practice, defining Urban Service Areas leads to better land and infrastructure planning by <br />reducing "leapfrog" development. "Leapfrog" develop occurs when infrastructure investments <br />are made in outlying areas away from existing urban and suburban areas. This practice results in <br />higher costs for road and utility improvements and also fragments agricultural areas straining the <br />agricultural economy. By eliminating "leapfrog" development better fiscal planning for utility <br />and road infrastructure and public facilities such as parks and schools is possible. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />With adoption of the 50 year Water and Wastewater Master Plan, the Water and Sewer <br />Authority and its member jurisdictions have defined where an Urban Service Area should be <br />established. Map 3 presents the proposed Urban Service Area boundary. This boundary was <br /> <br /> <br />