AG 1996 05 21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SIX MONTHS MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES STATUS (Continuation Programs Only) In the space provided, please list each measurable objective in your em-rent program agreement and indicate the degree to which your program has been successful in achieving them. (Use data from the first six months of the fiscal year.) Measurable objectives met July 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995. · 85% referred children served 84% - 16 of 19 children referred were served. Two continued in their present placements and need was alleviated. One was referred but was on mn and other plan~ were made. Three were already in placement on 7/1/95 giving a total of 15 served during first six months. 60% prepared for long term placement 64% - 9 of 14 returned home, placed in foster home or group home or placed with relatives as determined to be the best long term placement. 1 placed in group care, kicked out 2 were placed in foster homes and ran away. 1 ran and was not located for 30 days, went to sister's. 50% achieved successful adjustment for six months 50% - 7 of 14 children placed between September 1, 1994 and March 31, 1995 have had no new court referrals and have made successful long term care placements. Four of the 14 children terminated had additional court charges. Five had multiple placements. Four were out of school on suspension. Of the 7 successfully adjusting to their placements, 5 are at home. Bctw..cen 7/1/94 and 6/30/95, we had 20 children placed in the group home; 2 were for less than 30 days, 2 for 30 to 60 days, 7 for 60 to 90 days, and 5 for the maximum 90 days. Four were for extensions of maximum of 120 days. If'we have 5 children stay for 90 days our maximum is 20 children served. From 7/1/95 through 3/5/96, we had had 20 children placed. Currently there are 3 children placed in the group home as of 3/5/96. In the CBA 4th quarter report of FY-95, our statistics for the past 12 months showed 88% referred by court, 88% referred by court, 88% referred as delinquent or status offenders. Our performance indicators showed 81% decrease in additional court referrals, 60% decrease in runaways, and 28% decrease in school suspension/expulsion. 77% were between the ages of 14 and 17; 66% were white, 33% black; 55% female, 44% male· 88% were active with Juvenile Court, 82% were on probation or court supervision, 5% had a petition filed and 11% were at risk of Juvenile Court involvement. 68% had successful completion of the program. 6% were removed by court, 12% because runaway and 12% because the did not adjust. At time of discharge 87% were enrolled in school, 31% had had court referrals while placed at the group home. 37% had had at least one runaway, 56% had school suspension or expulsions and 18% had been in secure custody. At discharge 62% went to relatives or hack home, 24% went to group home or foster home, 6% went to other living arrangements including hospitalization and 6% went to training school.