Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />March 12,2019 <br />drove the site. He was not dressed appropriately for walking around today, so I did not walk <br />around. <br />The Chair said I mean just in general. Have you ever been out there and walked it? <br />Mr. Healy: Yeah , I was out there today. We did a tour of the site and saw it. And I have been <br />around the perimeter at most, if not all of the observation points. A few of them were on some <br />driveways that we did not go back into. <br />Mr. Dagenhart said do you know the date of that Google data that you used? <br />Mr. Healy believes it is in the report. He thinks it was March of 20 18. He could check if you <br />would like. <br />Mr. Dagenhart said can one of you speak to when you had finished all your clearing? <br />Mr. Jansen said the grading, in large part, was complete by the end of March. All the tree <br />clearing, any cutting was definitely complete by that timeframe. <br />Mr. Corley said were you ever provided a landscape plan that did not show thelOO-foot buffer <br />being intact around the entire site? Did you ever get a plan that showed the impacts of the <br />encroachments into the buffer? <br />Mr. Healy said he does not think we utilized a plan such as that. <br />Mr. Corley said and the assumption. <br />Mr. Healy said the latest version, we did. <br />Mr. Corley said is there still an assumption in this revised report that assumes that there is some <br />level of vegetation that exists around the perimeter of that site. <br />Mr. Healy said how we did the analysis was we took the Google imagery right here (indicating) <br />and we measured where the foliage was based on this data. Where it was 1 ~O-foot wide, we <br />assumed that the trees were ten-foot tall. As you noted, they were probably 30 or greater. We just <br />assumed that if it was laO-foot wide, you wouldn't be able to see through that and that was just <br />for the line of sight analysis. That did not impact the results on the table that we just presented in <br />terms of all the yellow glare occurring at those observation points. <br />Mr. Corley said what can we do now, as a glint and glare professional? He is amazed at the <br />assumptions that went into this report and the fact that it still has not been updated with the sight <br />conditions that exist today. But, as a professional, what can we do now? Mr. Webb's <br />recommendation is that this study is a-we are looking into the future to see what the problems <br />25