Laserfiche WebLink
The next 25 years: Determining the Capital Needs of North Carolina's Public Utilities <br />In coming years, North Carolinians will be called upon to make unpremdented decisions <br />about water resources. 7o help guide these decisions, the Rural Gconomic llevelopment <br />C:enter in 20041aunched the multifaceted Water 20301nitiative. One of the initiative's <br />core missions was to create a detailed analysis of the state of water, sewer and stormwater <br />systems statewide. The analysis includes information about e~sting infrastructure and <br />fiscal mndition, plus projections of needed inveshnents through the yeaz 2030. '1'his <br />report summarizes those Eindings. <br />Setting the stage <br />Water 2030 is the Rural Center's second major inventory of water-related infrastructure. <br />[n 199H, the center concluded a three-year project that created a database and mapping <br />system for all community water and sewer systems in 78 of the statc's 100 counties.'Che <br />purpose was to answer questions about the condition of water and sewer systems and <br />needed investments as a guide foc planning and public policy development, particulady <br />with regard to infrastructure flnancing.'fhe project obtained information on more than <br />700 water and sewer systems. 7'his information was then incoTporated into the state <br />database managed by the Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. <br />Analysis of the data, summarized in the report "Clean Water: Our Livelihood, Our Life,,, <br />projected $11.34 Uillion in needed repairs, upgrades and expansions for public water and <br />sewer systems statewide by 2015. A companion study of capita] financing revealed an <br />increasing reliance on loans rather than grants for water and sewer construction, yet 60 <br />percent of North Carolina's ]ocal governments lacked the capacity to borrow money. <br />'fogether, these findings gave impetus for passage of the ] 99H Clean Water Aonds. Those <br />bonds provided $800 million for water and sewer projects across the state. <br />"I'heie were other significant ouYcomes as well, including: <br />^ Needs documented by the inidative doubled the estimates then being used by <br />the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to apportion federal money going <br />into the State Revolving Loan hunds. 7'hIs data, coupled wlth outreach efforts <br />by state and regional office staff, helped increase subsequent allocaHons to the <br />Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Fund. <br />^'Phe survey revealed that a majority of sewet pipes were of vitreous clay that had <br />exceeded its expected lifetime of 40 yeus. As a result, most systems were experi- <br />encing problems with groundwater and stonnwater infiltrnring the sewer lines <br />' and overtaxing wastewater treatment capacity. 7'his substantiated the need for <br />the state's 1998 SeweT Collection Enforcement Progcam, requiring that eve~y <br />' system develop a schedule of inspections, maintenance and improvements. <br />^ The data provided evidence for the need for reb~ionalization and mnsolidation of <br />water systems. Three out of four public water systems in 1998 served fewer than <br />3,300 customers. Greater efficiencies of scale were needed to mect incceasingly <br />G~ ii <br />