Laserfiche WebLink
stringent drinking water regulations while maintaining affordable rates. An <br />emphzsis on regionalization was incorporated into the legislation crearing the <br />1998 Clean Watec Bonds, and nearly 90 percent of all bond-funded projects <br />included aspects of regionalization o~ consolidation. <br />^ As intended, federal and state funders have used the report and database in <br />plamiing for and making decisions on funding of joint projects and managing <br />their own funding resources. "fhe computerized maps also proved vital in the <br />response to the flooding that followed Hurricane Floyd in 1999. <br />Complex and evolving picture <br />1'he 1998 initiative provided a detailed examination of the state of water and sewer <br />infrastrudure at the time. Over the nea;t few years, substantial investments were made <br />to improve and expand systems throughout the state. Yet there were indications that <br />aitical problems ~vere fai from resolved. <br />The 2000 Census showed that North Carolina's population had grown by 1 million <br />people over the preceding decade, outpacing predidions. Most of the population growth <br />occuered 'u~ urban oc uebanizing regions, stretching the ability of those communides to <br />keep pace with the need for infrastructure investments. Inaeasing urbanization and <br />resulting stormwater runoff also created significant watec quality concerns. <br />Longheld assumpHons about the abundance of water resources underv~;ent serious <br />challenge. A series of smdies documented dHRndling aquifers in the Coastal Plain, <br />where most communities xely on groundwater supplies. As a result, the Environmental <br />Manage~nent Commission imposed a Capacity Use Area designation on 15 counties, <br />directing them to reduce groundwater withdrawals by up to 75 percent over 16 years. <br />In the Piedmont, four consecutive years of drought showed the vulnerability of certain <br />surface water supplies. In 2002, more than 90 systems were placed under mandatory <br />water conservation, and many others agreed to voluntary conservation. Heavy rains in <br />early 2003 relieved the immediate crisis, but in 2005, drought again threatened the <br />watec supplies in the northem Piedmont. <br />Comperition for the use of water resources became more apparent. Stakeholde~ groups <br />formed in the Catawba and Yadkin dver basins to take part in the hydroelectric <br />relicensing process of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Water usage and flow <br />regulation aze part of the discussion. On the Roanoke and othec civets, environmental <br />groups are urging the adoption of ecologically sustainable flow regulatio~~. <br />Additlonal regulations are leading to increasing costs. New, more stringent regulations <br />govem cvater and sewee treahnent, and new pollurion control rules require communities <br />to better manage stonnwater runoff. <br />At the same time, locaL govemments face uncertainries in the financial arena. Many <br />benefited from extraordinaiily low interest tates over the last decade as they mmed <br />increasingly to pzivate mazket lenders to finance capital improvements. Whether those <br />low rates will continue is unclear. Furthermore, federal support for grants and loans - <br />G--1 3 <br />