My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
AG 1998 01 20
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Agendas
>
BOC
>
1998
>
AG 1998 01 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2002 6:03:50 PM
Creation date
11/27/2017 11:50:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meeting Minutes
Doc Type
Agenda
Meeting Minutes - Date
1/20/1998
Board
Board of Commissioners
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We do not contend that industrial development is unnecessary. However, providing a <br />blanket rezoning up to the most intense land use without appropriate safeguards is not in <br />anyone's best interests. It is not realistic to limit this development to only 100,000 sq ft <br />buildings on 7-acre parcels; at the same time, it is unwise to grant General Industrial <br />zoning to such a large site as 500+ acres. <br /> <br />7. The site would create excessive noise, dust, air and light pollution, and other <br />impacts. The environmental impacts of industrial sites are well known; that is why they <br />are often buffered with other land uses. Noise from manufacturing activity and truck <br />deliveries, dust from manufacturing and processing, chemical smells and occasional spills, <br />bright high-profile lights that penetrate nearby woods, increased criminal activity and <br />other impacts have been well documented in the planning literature. Most jurisdictions <br />account for these impacts in their zoning. These impacts can be controlled, but not <br />through this rezoning proposal. <br /> <br />Actions we recommend <br />As we noted above, we are not opposed to development, and many of us have worked <br />hard with County officials and others to ensure that Cabarrus County has the right mix of <br />land uses, appropriately located. However, this proposal, although well-intended, is ill- <br />conceived, inappropriately located, and too large for its site. We therefore recommend the <br />following: <br /> <br />1. Deny the request in its entirety, and begin a review of the Western Area Plan. <br />Based on the above analysis, we believe that the proposed rezoning should be rejected. <br />However, the issue of appropriate land use in the western area of Cabarrus County needs <br />immediate attention. Therefore we call for an immediate joint review of the Western <br />Area Plan, by the City of Concord and Cabarms County, with significant citizen input. <br />The Area Plans were designed for update and revision every 3-5 years, so as to continually <br />be in tune with the overall development of the County. This review should be undertaken <br />regardless of whether or not the rezoning is approved. We ask that the requesters <br />withdraw their proposal, and allow this discussion to occur. <br /> <br />2. Short of that, rezone only a portion of the proposed area as Limited Industrial, <br />with conditions. If the area is to be rezoned, then limit that rezoning to the parcel <br />immediately adjacent to the Airport entrance (Motley land), which is also adjacent to <br />Limited Industrial land on the south. This site is shown in Map 2. These two parcels, <br />about 75 acres, are more appropriate for Limited Industrial classification than the entire <br />area, since this classification maintains the land use buffer between Limited Industrial and <br />the residential subdivisions, reduces the impacts of traffic, is adjacent to the present <br />Limited Industrial classifications to the south along Derita Road, and allows direct access <br />to Interstate 85 via Speedway Bvld <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.