Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />March 12,2019 <br />Mr. Corley said Mr. Webb one of the things we discussed a couple of months ago, was a general <br />assumption in that glare study, that took into account the existing vegetation was there, that some <br />of which has now been removed. Are those assumptions still in this revised plan or do you think <br />that the vegetation assumptions, accurately reflect, what is actually on the site now? <br />Mr. Webb said the report did not revise that portion of the assumptions. As I said, the profiles <br />were pulled out. In many cases around the site, there is vegetation that will block this. But, there <br />are some areas up at the intersection of Joyner Road and Mount Pleasant Road and then as you <br />come back towards where the substation --I'm not sure what --what is the name of your on-site <br />substation? <br />Mr. Jansen said that area of the project? <br />Mr. Webb said yes. <br />Mr. Jansen said Mexico. <br />Mr. Webb: Okay. Where their power distribution, I guess collection assembly is, that area <br />through there. Then as you go west on Joyner Road, from the intersection of Mount Pleasant <br />Road, the first part of that area also has some areas that are visible that were identified as <br />temporary impacts. As you move farther down Joyner Road, you do have some existing <br />screening and some landscaping that have been added that appear to be reducing impacts from <br />that. <br />The Chair said do you think there will have to be another glare study after landscape is <br />completed. <br />Mr. Webb said to be honest with you, at this point, the study itself is to predict what is to occur. <br />They have already predicted the areas that are of concern, the panels are already installed. This <br />week starts the beginning of the potential issues for time. I think it is more an issue of visible <br />observation, to see what actually occurs. <br />The Chair asked ifthere were any more questions for Mr. Webb. <br />Mr. Jay Wood said Mr. Webb, the report says that they were to evaluate for the SGHAT every <br />minute of a full calendar year. He said further digging into the FAA descriptions of some of the <br />things in there, did we get a data set of when this started and when this stopped, because that is <br />quite a lot of data. Do we know what calendar date, what month, what year this started, when it <br />ended? <br />Mr. Webb said yes, sir. In the report, they actually have a very nice chart that starts in January <br />and it runs all the way through December at the bottom of the page. As you go up, it goes up <br />over 24 hours. Each area where they identified a potential hazard. <br />21