Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />March 12,2019 <br />Mr. Rockett asked if that person was qualified. What made that person qualified to make those <br />determinations? <br />Mr. Benshoffsaid that person is Al Jansen. He is here tonight if you would like to ask him. Ijust <br />want to make it very clear that these two sentences do not mean that the analysis assumed there <br />was a 100-foot wide buffer there of 10-foot tall trees. The results are not based on that <br />assumption. He asked Mr. Healy if that is correct? <br />Mr. Healy said the results giving all the yellow indications, is from the SGHA T tool. The line of <br />sight analysis is what we previously had, which was used to determine whether we thought it <br />was visible or not. Again, this analysis was done at our desktops and this was prior to getting out <br />and being in the field to check these things. <br />Mr. Rockett said, so again, I will ask. The client, your client that hired you to do this study, is the <br />one that provided data that is crucial to determining whether or not glare and glint that they <br />would not want to be present is not present? <br />Mr. Healy said they determined ifthere was a line of sight from that observation point to the <br />modules they could see. <br />Mr. Paxton said I am back to the original question, someone presented, at the conclusion of this <br />process, is the applicant willing to have you come back and verify the areas in yellow have been <br />secured? <br />Mr. Jansen said yeah; Mr. Chair, Mr. Paxton and Mr. Corley, to have an as-built survey analysis <br />done, yes, most definitely, there is no question. <br />Mr. Dagenhart said if that as-built survey shows there is still deficient areas, the applicant is <br />willing to mitigate those? <br />Mr. Jansen said that is the obligation we have, yes. Can I take an additional second here, Mr. <br />Chair? With regard to Mr. Healy's answers here, I do not think what he is clarified completely is <br />there has been a difference between desktop study and also the field surveys. There has been <br />field analysis done. I know Mr. Rockett was asking about the field. Yeah, I went out strictly to <br />take a look at, from the observation points, what could be seen and what could not be seen. If <br />modules could be seen, it was clearly fed back to our partners at Burns & McDonnell that we <br />could see modules from these observation points. Ifwe could not see, it was also fed back to <br />them the depth of the vegetation from the various observation points. <br />From there, like I said, it is desktop, but the field analysis and that is what you are actually <br />asking for again, further field analysis. <br />The Chair said thank you. He asked if there were any other questions. <br />33