My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
March-12-2019-Minutes
CabarrusCountyDocuments
>
Public Meetings
>
Meeting Minutes
>
Planning
>
2019
>
March-12-2019-Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2019 4:45:57 PM
Creation date
5/31/2019 3:28:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Minutes
Planning Minutes - Date
6/12/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />March 12,2019 <br />Mr. Dagenhart said going to the next sheet, which will be L-l.3, the lower corner there where it <br />turns 90, where you got a 600 feet, at B 1 E on the south end of - <br />Mr. Corley said it is that spot we spoke about where you have that 600-foot section. <br />Mr. Jansen said that area right there, correct (showed on the diagram)? <br />Mr. Dagenhart said right, around there and around the corner. He said based upon field <br />observations, the area that you are showing is not impacted and is in compliance, we do not <br />agree. You need to increase that buffer around those areas. <br />Mr. Jansen said so you suggest taking that BIE buffer and extending that? <br />Mr. Dagenhart said right, along where the Kleinfelder had said the encroachment was. There was <br />a concern in the field there; help me with the property owner there. <br />Mr. Corley said Criswells. <br />Mr. Dagenhart said Criswells. He said that looks to be adequate. Obviously, you will have to <br />make sure you do not have those building encroachments where you are trying to put <br />landscaping, but that is a private issue. <br />Mr. Jansen said yes. <br />Mr. Dagenhart said we talked in the field about around the streams and the wetlands. You have <br />adequately displayed what we discussed in the field. Those areas look good. The only area I <br />cannot remember, was going to the north side of Joyner L-l.l, back in that back corner, the back <br />right corner B7. He asked ifB7 is a buffer. It shows that it is existing and it is adequate, but I <br />thought we determined that day in the field, that it needed something else there. So, help me <br />understand what you are trying to show there. <br />Mr. Jansen said in through here is a cursory of the BIB buffer and then below that showing 828 <br />feet of the B7, existing vegetation, which is indicated as being compliant. <br />Mr. Dagenhart: Okay . <br />Mr. Jansen said then as we go further south and we have areas where there is the sediment basin <br />there, we will have a B 1 buffer. He thinks, if you are remembering from the site visit that is an <br />area that we did encroach into the buffer with the basin. <br />Mr. Dagenhart said right. I cannot think of any other areas, based upon the field visit, the ones <br />that I went with. Is there anything that we are missing? Did the other group have anything to <br />add? <br />49
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.