Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />March 12,2019 <br />hearing that we cannot deal with. I understand the Board's position I do not suspect at this point I <br />am going to be able to convince the Board as a whole to change their minds, but I would ask that <br />we follow this similar process for an April hearing if possible and knock down more of the items <br />that we need to resolve, knowing that they won't all be resolved. But, by that time, perhaps the <br />Board's faith in what we are doing will increase and we can leave that hearing with approved <br />conditions and for an amended CUP. <br />Mr. Dagenhart said knowing that you will not have the glare study in time for an April meeting, I <br />do not want to see you personally --not you personally, but I do not want to see you before this <br />Board until you have a complete package, until you are ready to address the items that were put <br />before you tonight to fix. Until you have it ready to address, I do not feel you need to come <br />before this Board. <br />Mr. Gittens said so, an indefinite postponement of the next hearing? <br />Mr. Dagenhart said no, no, phase one of the glint study, like we talked about; address the <br />landscaping. You cannot have all of that taken care of before an April meeting. <br />Mr. Gittens said the landscape, there are multiple items to correct on the landscape plan. We can <br />certainly fix most of them, possibly all of them by the time we have the next hearing, ifit is in <br />April. The glare study, I would have to tum to Mr. Healy. <br />Mr. Dagenhart ,said, I guess what I am saying is I do not want you to submit by Friday, a plan for <br />staff that is only 80 percent for landscaping. If you cannot address all the comments tonight <br />about landscaping, there is no reason to even come in April. In addition, you won't even have the <br />glint study resolved by then. <br />Mr. Rockett said a comment was made earlier that we were two to three weeks away from that <br />being ready, which certainly means it is not going to be turned in by Friday, which means it <br />cannot be ready for review in April. I believe that Mr. Benshoff mentioned earlier that there were <br />parts, with tomorrow being Wednesday, that it was not feasible to have to us by Friday, which <br />would be, even a grace period beyond what Staffs deadline is for items to review. <br />Mr. Dagenhart made a motion that the Board consider the applicant's request to take partial <br />submittal of what has been addressed today or the comments back to the applicant. <br />The Chair said do we have a second? <br />Mr. Wood is not sure what Mr. Dagenhart is proposing. Can you say that again? <br />Mr. Dagenhart said, he is asking us to consider, so let us put it before a vote and consider it, to <br />move forward with an April meeting with partial comments addressed, as opposed to coming <br />back on a later date with everything addressed. <br />57