Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />January 8, 2019 <br />28 <br /> <br />have to go back and look at the reports to see what those profiles look like. But, if he remembers <br />correctly, the report was geared more about roads than it was residential structures. <br />The Chair said, so for like storm water and stuff, would it be better for you to get on the site and <br />take a look? <br />Mr. Webb: Yes, sir. <br />The Chair asked if there were any questions. <br />Mr. Dagenhart does not have any questions per se, but he think Mr. Jansen stated earlier that they <br />were eight to ten-foot mature height at planting of hollies. He said Mr. Jansen is shaking his head <br />yes that is correct. <br />Mr. Dagenhart would strongly suggest that staff also not recommend any Leyland Cyprus. <br />Granted, they grow fast, but they can become diseased and they die. Once one gets diseased, it <br />spreads, he does not know that is what they are proposing, but he thinks we need to stay away <br />from those. <br />Mr. Benshoff said he has a question for Mr. Webb. <br />The Chair told Mr. Benshoff to ask the question through the Board and they would ask the <br />question to Mr. Webb. <br />Mr. Benshoff said that is how you do it? <br />Mr. Koch: Yes. <br />Mr. Benshoff: Thank you, Mr. Koch. He would like to ask Mr. Webb, through the board, what <br />standard he expects NC 102 Project to meet in the perimeter buffer. Because the implication is, <br />that he has heard, is that it is a totally opaque screen around the project and given the grade <br />change and the hills on the site, it could be very difficult to screen the entire farm from any <br />outside vantage point. <br />The Chair asked Mr. Webb if he wants to answer the question or if he wants the Chair to answer <br />it. <br />Mr. Webb said he could answer that question. The basis, he was reviewing the report on was <br />based off the consultants’ report, which said that it identified areas where there were potential <br />issues and that the screening should be blocked. The visibility was an issue and it should be <br />blocked. It did not say substantially, it did not say partially, it just said blocked. I used his reports <br />and his statements, as what I am basing is an acceptable item. I am not an expert in this field. I