March-12-2019-Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes March 12,2019 If the Board remembers, there was a violation of Condition Number 6, which was that 100-foot buffer that was to remain around the perimeter of the property. Encroachments also with clearing into that vegetative buffer, arrays and racking placed within the 100-foot setback and in the buffer, the waterbody buffer zone violations along, and across, Bost Creek, floodway in known encroachment area, disturbances along and across Bost Creek and also waterbody buffer zone violations around identified wetlands on the site. The Board has been to the site and you now have field observations. Some ofthat came up at the last meeting, so we tried to tie the staff observations and the Board observations into this memo to try to direct your discussion in those specific areas. The Board of Adjustment would need to determine whether or not the new landscape plan, the proposed plan for remediation of the stream buffers, wetland buffers, and the floodplain encroachment, and updated documents provided are adequate to address site compliance for the violations issued on the site and to meet the original intent of the conditions outlined in Conditional Use 2017-00001. Staff has again, attempted to outline the items that the Board needs to talk about and the Board needs to talk about each one of these items and ask questions of the staff, the applicant, and each other, as necessary. She said Mr. Al Jansen and Mr. Mo Wiepjes is here. They were the two folks that helped with the site visits and answered some of the questions that you had. They can answer any questions that you have about the site. Mo will need to be sworn in, however, if you do want to talk to him. There are also representatives here from DEPCOM. Mr. Greg Patzer, is here to answer any questions that you may have related to the site in general. The one thing that neither group really can talk about is terms of settlement or contractual terms. If you will just keep that in mind as you are asking questions. The summary information is here. As we go through each one of these, we can tell you which staff acted as point person for that particular review, ifthere was a very specific review needed. She said the applicant can determine who would be best to answer questions from their side. So, you have a memo that outlines, in general, the items. You have a response that the applicant submitted to comments, that was actually part of the initial staff report because there were items that were not addressed before the plan was presented to the Board. You have the original conditions of approval for the project, as well as the proposed conditions of approval for the project. She said hopefully, using these three documents, we can guide you through your discussion and then the new documents that the applicant has submitted either since the last meeting or since the December meeting, including the documents that were passed up to you at the February meeting. The Chair said at this point, he would like to start with the noise and noise wall information . Who would that be? Would that be Al who we would speak to about that? 13