Laserfiche WebLink
Planning and Zoning Commission <br />Minutes <br />March 12,2019 <br />When we were out there, we talked to them again about the encroachments. The Board was <br />provided with that information, as well as, the copy of the Criswell survey that showed that those <br />buildings where there was a question, that the Criswells are actually encroaching onto the solar <br />site. They will need to figure that out with the Criswells, as far as what they are going to do <br />there, but they do think that they can still accommodate, whether some of it is interior to the <br />fence and then exterior to the fence; the buffer yard. In that particular area as well, there were a <br />couple of things that came up during your site visit and the field observations. <br />One was that that area was really tight and the Board was not sure how you could make the road, <br />the panels, fire access, and the landscaping all happen in that comer. Also, whether or not the <br />height of the fence in that area was high enough or if it needed to be higher in that particular <br />area, since it was right up against a residential area and there were horses there. So, the applicant <br />did provide information from their surveyor, so you have the individual surveys as well as the <br />letter. <br />You have the letter from February 12th, which stated that they had identified, they had worked <br />on the Edgefield property and that near the Riley property, they also identified where the right- <br />of-way was and that there was an encroachment ofthe fence, but not of the panels. And then the <br />other items are identified on the second letter, which is from March 4th of2019. You can see that <br />there is a section in array number 1, which is that same area; array number 2, which is in that <br />very comer, the fence is close, but not in the buffer; array number 3, which is the diagram that I <br />showed you, that is there and it also crosses a portion of the detention pond, that wall will have <br />to be closed out and graded before they will really be able to put in the permanent fence in that <br />area. <br />The other two areas, he confirmed that the fence is close, but not in the buffer. In those particular <br />areas, there wasn't really questions about the racking. The racking and the panels were near the <br />Stewart property, on the rear of the Stewart property, and then on the Joyner property. <br />Ms. Morris will be happy to answer any questions that you have and she believes the applicant <br />can provide some additional information about that, the temporary versus the permanent fencing, <br />if you are interested in hearing about that. <br />The Chair said would that be Al or would that be DEPCOM? <br />Ms. Morris said probably whoever wants to take it. <br />Mr. Jansen said I will take it. Questions? <br />The Chair said a lot of things to discuss, I guess, on this one. What are your thoughts on fixing <br />some of them? The section offence in the buffer, drawing it and all of that. I guess the north <br />east side of array 3. <br />41